COLLATERAL DAMAGE:
HOW AB50 AFFECTS NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF .50 CALIBER BMG RIFLES
By Jason Davis
It goes without saying that California is a breeding ground for
anti-gun legislation and litigation. But if you do not live there,
what do you care? It doesn't affect you. Or does it?
In fact, what happens in California does affect you, as well as
the rest of the nation. The frivolous laws and lawsuits in California
spread across the nation like a virus, mutating along the way to
cure any defects or objections that are necessary to promote their
passage. But even when the law does not spread, even when the law
stays in California, it can cause national and international firearms
businesses to suffer irreparable damage by affecting the manufactures,
distributors and dealers ability to promote their products. Such
is the case now with .50 caliber BMG rifles.
As of January 1, 2005 California Assembly Bill 50 is in effect.
The language of the bill makes it clear that .50 caliber BMG rifles
are not to be sold or offered for sale to anyone in the State of
California, unless the person is within a special privileged class
that is exempt from the restrictions. Nor are these rifles to be
possessed within the state unless the possessor had the firearm
prior to 2005 and registers the firearm by April 30, 2006. But,
AB50 did more than regulate the transfer and possession of .50 caliber
BMG rifles within the state of California. It also regulated the
First Amendment free speech rights of fifty caliber manufactures,
distributors, dealers and magazine publishers throughout the world
by prohibiting them from advertising on the internet or in nationally
circulated magazines!
To many who have read AB50, this may be the first they have heard
of this restriction on advertising. You can read AB50 until you
are blue in the face and never see this prohibition. So how did
the State ban fifty caliber advertisements from national publications?
As discussed below, the answer is simple, slight of hand!
When the California legislature decided to ban the sale of .50
caliber BMG rifles, they could have done what they have always done
by creating an entirely new section within the Penal Code as they
did with "assault weapons," "destructive devices,"
"short barreled rifles/shotguns," and "machine guns."
But AB50 did not create entirely new Penal Code sections for the
restrictions the California legislature placed on .50 caliber BMG
rifles. Instead, the legislature decided to insert the restrictive
language within existing Penal Code sections.
Since AB50 chose to regulate a particular firearm based upon its
purported and grossly exaggerated destructive capabilities and firepower
the appropriate location for the restrictions would have been California's
"destructive device" laws, which restrict the sales of
firearms over .60 calibers in size due to their purported destructive
capabilities.
But AB50 amended the State's current Penal Code sections that address
firearms they deem to be "assault weapons," beginning
with Penal Code section 12275. At first this may appear to be an
odd choice of location for the .50 caliber BMG ban since the stated
purpose for restricting firearms deemed to be "assault weapons"
is their capability for a "high rate of fire," not their
"destructive capabilities." Nevertheless, the placement
of the AB-50 language within the "assault weapon" statutes
was entirely intentional and well planned.
In general, Penal Code section 12275 and the sections that follow
prohibit the manufacture, distribution, transportation, importation
into California, keeping/offering/exposing for sale, giving or lending
of any "assault weapon." As stated above, AB50 added .50
caliber BMG rifles to this section.
While the restrictions against keeping/offering/exposing for sale
appear to preclude any advertising, Penal Code section 12280(e)
states that these prohibitions do not apply to the sale to, purchase
by, or possession of assault weapons by the Department of Justice,
police departments, sheriffs' offices, marshals' offices, the Youth
and Adult Corrections Agency, the Department of the California Highway
Patrol, district attorneys' offices, Department of Fish and Game,
Department of Parks and Recreation, or the military or naval forces
of this state or of the United States, or any federal law enforcement
agency for use in the discharge of their official duties. In fact,
there are many more exceptions for the sale of .50 caliber BMG rifles
to certain governmental entities and permittees throughout AB50.
And a firearm cannot be sold unless it was kept, offered, and exposed
for sale. Thus, one would assume that since AB50 provided exceptions
for sales to various governmental entities that this necessarily
means that offers for sale and advertisements would be allowed if
aimed at those who may lawfully purchase .50 caliber BMG rifles
pursuant to the exceptions within AB50. This, however, is not the
case.
As was stated above, AB50 did not create a new section of the Penal
Code for the regulation of .50 caliber BMG rifles, but amended the
"assault weapon" laws. This was a strategic move by the
anti-gun lobbyists to cause collateral damages against the fifty
caliber industry without being expressly stated in the language
of AB50. By amending the "assault weapon" laws to include
.50 caliber BMG rifles, all other laws that previously refer to
and applied to "assault weapons" now also apply to .50
caliber BMG rifles.
One Code in particular, Penal Code section 12020.5, changes the
face of fifty caliber marketing and advertisements throughout the
nation. Penal Code section 12020.5 provides that:
It shall be unlawful for any person [individual, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company, association, or any other
group or entity, regardless of how it was created], to advertise
the sale of any weapon or device whose possession is prohibited
by Section...12280 in any newspaper, magazine, circular, form letter,
or open publication that is published, distributed, or circulated
in this state, or on any billboard, card, label, or other advertising
medium, or by means of advertising device.
Thus, it is a criminal offense to advertise .50 BMG rifles within
"any advertising device" if the advertisement is circulated
within the State of California. This language expressly prohibits
any advertisements of .50 caliber BMG rifles in national and international
publications that are circulated within the State. It also prohibits
any form of internet advertising since it is impossible to absolutely
prohibit any person from viewing any online advertisement from within
California.
In addition to being a criminal offense, this ban on advertisements
has been used in the past as a basis for California's very liberally
applied unfair business practice laws, as was the case in People
v. Arcadia Machine & Tool. In that lawsuit a civil lawsuit was
filed against many firearm manufacturers, distributors, dealers
and associations, including out of state firearm distributors, alleging
that they advertised "assault weapons" in violation of
Penal Code section 12020.5. Ultimately, two of the defendants that
this law was used against settled, only after incurring tens of
thousands of dollars in legal fees.
You may ask, how is this legal? The simple truth is that it is
not. California Penal Code section 12020.5 violates .50 caliber
BMG rifle and "assault weapon" manufacturer's, distributor's,
dealer's and consumer's rights to free speech set forth in the First
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Unfortunately, the
California legislature has proven to have a great distain for firearm
industry and the rights of its citizens. It is unlikely that this
law will be repealed. Thus, this law will stand until challenged
and proven unconstitutional in a court of law. The only question
is how many people will be prosecuted? How many people will be civilly
liable for advertising such firearms? And, who will stand up to
the state of California to seek the repeal of this law?
The Fifty Caliber Institute is poised to challenge California on
this law before it ruins the entire fifty caliber industry. With
your help, we can make a difference and show the anti-gunners that
while we may be a small minority, we too are constitutionally protected.